South Korean Watchdog Plans Direct Supervision of Crypto Exchanges

A South Korean monetary watchdog underneath the Monetary Companies Fee (FSC) is planning to extra carefully supervise cryptocurrency exchanges.
The company in query, the Monetary Intelligence Unit (FIU), has mentioned it should straight regulate crypto buying and selling platforms, which at present are not directly managed by way of steering given to banks, says a report in Enterprise Korea on Wednesday.
For instance, final 12 months, the FSC amended the anti-money laundering guidelines making use of to cryptocurrency exchanges, which was to be carried out by requiring home banks to tighten up monitoring of exchange-held accounts.
In in the present day’s report, Lee Tae-hoon, director of administration and planning on the FIU, was cited as saying Tuesday that the Korean authorities will arrange a licensing system for crypto exchanges, as not too long ago advisable in new worldwide requirements issued by the Monetary Motion Process Power (FATF). The transfer would increase the transparency of cryptocurrency transactions, Lee mentioned.
“If an modification to the Act on Reporting and Use of Sure Monetary Transaction Data, which displays the FATF’s worldwide requirements for cryptocurrencies, passes the Nationwide Meeting, it is going to be attainable to stop cash laundering via cryptocurrencies,” Lee defined at a public listening to on crypto transparency on the Nationwide Meeting.
Approval of the modification would make laws simpler “by shifting from the present oblique regulation via industrial banks to direct regulation,” Lee added.
In line with a Wednesday weblog submit from crypto compliance answer supplier Argos, the modification may deliver within the controversial “journey rule,” which means that exchanges must share info on events when making transactions. This might pose a serious downside for exchanges as crypto transactions don’t embrace figuring out information, the submit says.
Korean Nationwide Meeting picture by way of Shutterstock

Comments (No)

Leave a Reply